excellent air support for the ground forces, minimizing the loss of American lives while maximizing success. But, there were civilian deaths because the enemy cowardly hides in civilian areas behind civilian shields.
And besides the bombing, Special Forces regularly executed night
General George S. Patton said, "Lead me, follow me, or get out of my way." Mr. President , are you listening? We are nearing the end of the president's second year in office and, as he promised, things have changed in Iraq and Afghanistan. But the question is not missions directed at selected Taliban leaders. The air support and the night missions were successful and saved American lives.
But the president ignored Sun Tze's advice, "The art of war is simple enough. Find out where your enemy is. Get at him as soon as you can. Strike him as hard as you can, and keep moving on." Air support for ground forces decreased more than 75 percent and the valuable and successful night raids targeting key Taliban leaders were nearly eliminated. Why? Why would the president reluctantly agree to give Gen. Stanley McChrystal more troops only to purposefully place them at unnecessary risk?
The logic for NBA-Jerseys the loss of air support ? Now that we have more ground forces, we can forgo some of the air support that resulted in civilian casualties. The result of this decision? Newspaper headlines succinctly answer the question. Shortly after the policy change on air support they read, "Airstrikes in Afghanistan drop by almost half" and "Coalition eases up on Afghan airstrikes." Now that his policy has been in place the headlines read, "Afghanistan war toll hit high mark," and "U.S. military death toll in Afghanistan reaches 1,000."
And why the dramatic decrease in Special Forces night missions? They are deemed "too violent" and too risky for the civilians in the homes christian audigier hiding the targeted Taliban leaders. Aren't these encounters supposed to be violent, overwhelmingly violent?
Well, how are Special Forces treated when they do their job? Remember the seal team that captured Ahmed Hashim Abed who was behind the ambush of four Blackwater guards in 2004, their bodies burned and dragged throughout the city, then hung from a bridge. The capture was violent, the seals risking their lives to capture Abed alive.
And the result of this daring and heroic capture? Maybe congratulations ? Maybe medals? Neither. Three of the seals faced charges because of the bloody lip Abed sustained.
Mr. President, either bring our children home or listen to General Douglas MacArthur's admonition, "It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." If you decide to keep our children there, then lead, follow or get out of the way. if things have changed, but have they improved.
Alexander McQueen ShoesThe decision to go to war is political. The decision to end a war is political. But war itself is not. The president is expert at politics; the military is expert at war. The president must balance political realities with military realities. And during peacetime political realities often carry more weight than military ones. But during times of war, if military realities cannot carry more weight than political ones, should we even be at war?
The president, as commander-inchief , must provide his troops the resources needed to succeed. And not just to succeed, but also to succeed minimizing loss of American life and se
Other articles:
http://www.blyjy.com/blog/blog.asp?Uid=mywatches&id=1077
http://www.hxctwh.com/bbsxp/Blog.asp?BlogUserName=mywatche&menu=ShowBlog&BlogID=626
...
